# Adapt calls itself a company agent platform. What are the best Adapt alternatives? And which ones are ready to use without building anything?

Source: https://maito.app/compare/adapt-alternatives
Date: 2026-10-14
Author: Dmitry Dubovetzky

Adapt alternatives: Maito, Viktor, Claude Tag, Lindy, and Tasklet compared on setup, who maintains the agent, models, code, governance, and price, for teams deciding how much of their company agent they want to own.

## Why do teams look for an Adapt alternative?

**Teams look for an Adapt alternative when they want a finished AI teammate rather than a platform to configure, when per-user pricing plus metered infrastructure is harder to plan than one subscription, or when nobody on the team wants to own the agent's setup.**

Adapt combines a runtime, company context, model routing, connections, and several surfaces into what it calls a company agent platform. It lists three ways to run it: an open-source runtime, a managed service, and Enterprise deployments in your VPC or on premises. Its Company Agent Developer Preview has a waitlist. [Adapt](https://adapt.com/), [Adapt pricing](https://adapt.com/pricing).

A platform gives you choices: models, keys, gateways, templates, APIs, MCP, and a CLI. Each choice is something a person on your team decides and maintains. An independent review praised Adapt's cross-tool company context and internal apps, and named setup and connection effort as the main cost. [Adapt review by Agent Finder](https://agent-finder.co/reviews/adapt).

## What does Adapt do well?

**Adapt is strongest for technical teams that want control: model routing or their own keys, transparent infrastructure prices, detailed governance, and deployment where they choose.**

It connects to Salesforce, HubSpot, Notion, Linear, BigQuery, Snowflake, PostgreSQL, Stripe, QuickBooks, Zendesk, Greenhouse, and GitHub, answers questions across them, processes files, builds internal apps, and runs scheduled and event-driven jobs. [Adapt platform](https://adapt.com/product/overview).

Its company brain separates knowledge, skills, memory, and live search, and prunes what it keeps. It turns issues into tested pull requests for human review. [Adapt company brain](https://adapt.com/product/company-brain), [Adapt](https://adapt.com/).

Governance is detailed: scopes, approvals on named actions, budgets, traces, identity-provider roles, and audit records. Enterprise adds SSO, SCIM, SIEM export, dedicated compute, and SOC 2 Type II. [Adapt Enterprise](https://adapt.com/enterprise).

Adapt's own engineers work through it in Slack. One wrote about commits being attributed to the shared agent rather than the person, and how personal integrations solved it. [Slack is my IDE](https://adapt.com/blog/slack-is-my-ide).

## What are the best Adapt alternatives?

**The best Adapt alternatives are Maito, Viktor, Claude Tag, Lindy, and Tasklet. Maito is the closest fit for teams that want Adapt's range, company knowledge, business work, and tested pull requests, as a ready teammate with one workspace price.**

- **Maito** is a ready AI teammate in Slack and your AI assistants, on the AI provider you choose, for $149 per workspace.
- **Viktor** is a ready AI employee in Slack and Microsoft Teams, with model usage included in workspace credits.
- **Claude Tag** is Anthropic's shared Claude in Slack, set up once by a Claude organization owner.
- **Lindy** is a shared teammate plus personal inbox and meeting assistance, billed per active user.
- **Tasklet** runs persistent business agents from its own app, per organization.

## How do the Adapt alternatives compare at a glance?

**Maito is the Adapt alternative that keeps provider choice and company knowledge while removing the platform work: install it, connect your tools, and give it a task.**

|                   | Maito                                | Viktor                       | Claude Tag                    | Lindy                               | Tasklet                         |
| ----------------- | ------------------------------------ | ---------------------------- | ----------------------------- | ----------------------------------- | ------------------------------- |
| What you get      | A ready AI teammate                  | A ready AI employee          | A ready shared Claude         | A ready team and personal assistant | Agents you create in its app    |
| Who maintains it  | Yes: Maito runs it; you add tools       | Yes: Viktor runs it             | Yes: Anthropic runs it           | Yes: Lindy runs it                     | Yes: Tasklet runs it               |
| Models            | Yes: The provider you choose            | Partly: Bundled into credits       | No: Claude only                 | Yes: Several models                    | Yes: Per-thread model choice       |
| Product code      | Yes: Sandbox, checks, QA, pull request  | Yes: Branches and pull requests | Yes: Commits and pull requests   | Partly: Internal tools and HTML pages     | Partly: GitHub tools and instant apps |
| Company knowledge | Yes: Facts and skills from shared work  | Yes: Team memory and skills     | Yes: Channel and workspace notes | Yes: Team files and skills             | Yes: Per-agent memory and drives   |
| Hosting           | Maito's cloud                        | Viktor's cloud               | Anthropic                     | Lindy's cloud                       | Tasklet's cloud                 |
| Price             | $149 per workspace, unlimited people | $100 per workspace, credits  | Claude plan plus usage        | $49.99 per active user              | From $25 per organization       |

## Is Maito a good Adapt alternative?

**Yes. Maito is a good Adapt alternative for teams that want a company agent with provider choice, shared knowledge, business work, and tested pull requests, without building or operating a platform.**

Setup is a short list: create a workspace, connect your AI provider, connect Slack, and add what the first task needs, such as a repository or your CRM. Credentials go in Vault, not into conversations. From then on, anyone in an invited Slack channel can ask for work, and teammates can reach the same agent from Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Codex, Grok, and Muse. [Maito FAQ](/faq).

You keep the decision Adapt users care most about: the model. Maito supports OpenAI, Anthropic, GitHub Copilot, xAI, OpenRouter, Amazon Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, Groq, Together, Fireworks, and many more, with one model for the workspace and, if you want, another for coding. Your provider bills usage directly, with no gateway markup from Maito.

For the commit attribution problem Adapt's engineers wrote about, Maito separates connections: a personal GitHub connection is used only in that person's private chats, and a company GitHub connection is used for shared work.

If you'd rather not do the setup at all, Maito's optional $999 setup connects Slack, your provider, repositories, and tools, and turns your recurring work into skills and Loops.

_Illustrative conversation:_

> **Kenji:** @Maito every Monday, compare last week's ad spend by channel with signups from the warehouse, and flag any channel where cost per signup rose more than 20%.
>
> **Maito:** Set up as a Loop for Mondays at 9:00. Last week's run is in the thread: LinkedIn cost per signup rose 31%, on two campaigns that point to the old pricing page.
> That page still shows last quarter's prices because a redirect was removed. PR #148 restores it and adds a check for the redirect. Ready for review.

## Does choosing Maito instead of Adapt mean giving up control?

**Choosing Maito over Adapt means giving up control of the runtime and hosting, and keeping control of the model, the provider bill, the connections, and what the agent knows.**

Maito runs in Maito's cloud. There's no self-hosted or on-premises version, and no VPC deployment. If your security team requires the agent to run on your infrastructure, Adapt Enterprise is the right choice.

For most teams, the controls that matter day to day are still yours: which provider and model run the work, which connections are personal or shared, what company knowledge the agent keeps, which skills it uses, and which Loops run. Company knowledge has revision history, and you can correct, restore, or forget any fact by asking.

## Is Viktor a good Adapt alternative?

**Viktor is a good Adapt alternative for teams that want a ready AI employee in Slack or Microsoft Teams with model usage bundled into one credit bill.**

Viktor does business assignments across more than 3,200 apps, writes code and opens pull requests, and remembers personal, team, and workflow knowledge. Admins control integration scopes, and sensitive actions need sign-off. [Viktor](https://viktor.com/), [Viktor security](https://viktor.com/security).

Team is $100 per workspace per month with 40,000 shared credits. [Viktor pricing](https://viktor.com/pricing).

## Is Claude Tag a good Adapt alternative?

**Claude Tag is a good Adapt alternative for companies standardized on Claude that want a shared agent in Slack set up once by an owner.**

A Claude organization Owner and a Slack admin connect credentials, repositories, and channels; after that, the team just tags Claude. Admins set reply scope, search scope, and spend limits per organization and per channel, and activity is recorded. [Claude Tag setup](https://claude.com/docs/claude-tag/admins/setup-overview), [Claude Tag access and limits](https://claude.com/docs/claude-tag/admins/restrict-access).

It runs only on Claude, where Adapt routes across many models. [What is Claude Tag](https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15594475-what-is-claude-tag).

## Is Lindy a good Adapt alternative?

**Lindy is a good Adapt alternative for teams whose company agent is mostly about email, calendars, meetings, and follow-ups.**

Lindy works in Slack, email, iMessage, and the web, with team and personal memory files, team and personal skills, and routines started by schedules, emails, calendar events, and finished meetings. [Lindy introduction](https://docs.lindy.ai/), [Lindy skills](https://docs.lindy.ai/teammate/skills).

It's $49.99 per active user per month, more per person than Adapt's $14, with credits included. [Lindy pricing](https://www.lindy.ai/pricing).

## Is Tasklet a good Adapt alternative?

**Tasklet is a good Adapt alternative for teams that want ready business agents at a low starting price, without per-user charges.**

You create agents in Tasklet's web or Mac app, connect tools, and let them run on schedules, webhooks, and email. Agents get isolated environments and per-agent tool permissions, and Tasklet is SOC 2 compliant. [Tasklet trust and security](https://tasklet.ai/learn/trust-security).

It's $25 per organization per month for 10,000 credits, with unlimited members. [Tasklet pricing](https://tasklet.ai/pricing).

## What does a ten-person team pay for Adapt and its alternatives?

**Ten users on Managed Adapt pay $140 a month before usage. Maito is $149 a month for the workspace, whatever the headcount, with model usage billed by your provider.**

|         | Ten people, base price | Usage on top                                                  |
| ------- | ---------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Adapt   | $140 per month         | Compute from $0.045 per vCPU-hour, storage, memory, models    |
| Maito   | $149 per month         | Your AI provider's usage; sandbox and search credits past $20 |
| Viktor  | $100 per month         | Credit top-ups past 40,000 credits                            |
| Lindy   | $499.90 per month      | Credit top-ups past the pooled credits                        |
| Tasklet | $25 per month          | Credits past 10,000                                           |

At ten people, Adapt and Maito start almost level. At 25, Adapt's base is $350 and Maito's is still $149. Adapt adds 5.5% to model prices through its gateway, or nothing with your own keys. [Adapt pricing](https://adapt.com/pricing).

## So should you choose Maito or Adapt?

**Choose Maito if you want a ready company teammate on the model you choose, without anyone on your team owning a platform. Choose Adapt if you need the agent on your own infrastructure or want to customize the runtime itself.**

**Choose Maito if:**

- Nobody on your team wants to maintain an agent platform
- You still want to choose the model and provider
- Business work and pull requests should come from one teammate
- Headcount will grow faster than your budget

**Choose Adapt if:**

- The agent must run in your VPC or on premises
- Your developers want to customize the runtime
- You need SCIM, SIEM export, or dedicated compute

Pick one issue and one weekly report your team needs. Count the hours it takes to get each one running in Adapt and in Maito, then compare the results.