Tasklet vs Adapt

What's the difference between Tasklet and Adapt?

Tasklet is a ready app where you create persistent business agents and pay for credits per organization. Adapt is a platform for running your company's agent, with control over models, governance, and hosting, paid per user plus metered usage.

Both are close in what the agents do: connect to business tools, run on schedules and events, build internal apps, and work with GitHub. They differ in how much you own. Tasklet runs everything for you and gives you a model menu per thread. Adapt gives you the parts, including keys, routing, budgets, traces, and deployment options, and expects someone to manage them.

What is Tasklet best at?

Tasklet is best at quick, always-on business agents that a nontechnical team can create, share, and leave running.

You describe an agent's job, connect its tools, and start threads with it. Agents respond to schedules, webhooks, and incoming email, browse on paid plans, and build instant apps such as trackers and approval forms. They run in isolated environments with per-agent tool permissions, and Tasklet is SOC 2 compliant.

Sources: Tasklet, Tasklet trust and security

What is Adapt best at?

Adapt is best at a governed company agent across many systems, with model routing or your own keys and Enterprise deployment in a VPC or on premises.

It connects to CRM, warehouse, finance, support, HR, and developer tools, keeps a company brain of knowledge, skills, memory, and live search, and turns issues into tested pull requests. Its Enterprise tier brings SSO, SCIM provisioning, SIEM export, dedicated compute, and a SOC 2 Type II report.

Sources: Adapt platform, Adapt Enterprise

How do Tasklet and Adapt compare at a glance?

Tasklet is ready and cheap to start. Adapt is configurable and built for governance.

Which one handles code better, Tasklet or Adapt?

Adapt's agents take engineering issues to tested pull requests that a person reviews. Tasklet works with what's in GitHub, including history, Actions logs, and pull request reviews, and takes approved workflow or merge actions.

Tasklet also has a sandboxed command line and builds instant apps, so it writes software; its focus is business automation rather than changes to your product's repository.

Adapt's templates include issue-to-pull-request work, changelogs, and website checks.

Sources: Tasklet changelog, Tasklet pricing, Adapt agents

How do Tasklet and Adapt bill usage?

Tasklet sells credits that cover models, browsing, and app building. Adapt bills each part separately: users, compute by the hour, storage, extra memory, and models at list price or through your own keys.

Tasklet's monthly credits expire each cycle, one-time credits last a year, and paid users get 600 bonus credits on days they use it. Building an instant app costs credits; using it costs little or nothing.

Adapt's compute costs $0.045 per vCPU-hour and $0.0175 per GiB-hour while running, parked compute is free, and storage and egress are free up to 50 GB.

Sources: Tasklet credit guide, Adapt pricing

What do Tasklet and Adapt cost?

Tasklet's entry plan is $25 a month for the whole organization, with 10,000 credits and unlimited members. Adapt Managed is $14 per user per month plus usage.

For ten people, Tasklet's base doesn't change and Adapt's is $140 before usage. For a team that needs governance and its own infrastructure, the difference pays for self-hosting options and deeper governance.

Sources: Tasklet pricing, Adapt pricing

So should you choose Tasklet or Adapt?

Choose Tasklet if you want ready business agents running this week at the lowest price. Choose Adapt if a technical team needs model control, deep governance, and the option to host the agent itself.

Is there a Tasklet or Adapt alternative that works in Slack and fixes your product too?

Yes. Maito is ready like Tasklet, runs on the AI provider you choose like Adapt, and works with your team in Slack threads and AI assistants, for $149 per workspace with unlimited people.

Recurring jobs run as Loops, business work uses your connected tools, and product fixes come back with checks, QA, and a pull request.

#billing

Victor8:40 AM

@Maito 23 card payments failed overnight in Stripe. Who are they, and why didn't they get our retry email?

MaitoAPP8:58 AM

All 23 are monthly plans. 19 were expired cards, 4 were bank declines. The retry email never sent because the dunning job skips customers whose plan was renamed in May. PR #415 matches plans by ID instead of name and adds a test. Checks pass. I drafted the retry email for all 23 so it can go out now. Want a morning Loop that lists failed payments?

Example complete

Sources: Maito FAQ