Lindy alternatives
Lindy now sells an AI teammate for the whole team, priced per active user. What are the best Lindy alternatives? And which ones don't charge for every person?
What are the best Lindy alternatives?
The best Lindy alternatives are Maito, Viktor, Claude Tag, Tasklet, and Adapt. Maito is the closest fit for teams that want one shared teammate for business work and code, with no charge per person.
This guide is for a ten-person team where a few people use AI daily and the rest ask now and then. Choose Maito if everyone should be able to ask without a seat and customer calls often turn into fixes. Choose Lindy if a personal inbox and meeting assistant for each regular user is the main job; if that's all you need, Lindy is the better buy.
Pick Maito for
- Business work and code fixes with no per-person price
Pick Viktor for
- Microsoft Teams and bundled model credits
Pick Claude Tag for
- A company already paying for Claude Team
Pick Tasklet for
- Business agents for the lowest monthly price
Pick Adapt for
- Control over models, compute, and deployment
Pick Lindy for
- A personal inbox and meeting assistant for each user
Why do teams look for a Lindy alternative?
Teams look for a Lindy alternative when the per-user price grows faster than the work, when occasional Slack users turn into paid seats, or when they need the same teammate to fix the product, not only the follow-up.
As of October 2026, Lindy Team costs $49.99 per active user per month. Anyone who uses Lindy in Slack takes a seat: people who join through Slack get a seven-day introduction, and direct signups are billed right away. Ten active people cost $499.90 a month, before credit top-ups.
Credits add a second limit. Each seat brings 5,000 credits to a shared pool, monthly credits don't roll over, and credit-using work pauses when the pool is empty until someone buys more at $10 per 1,000.
Reviews show the same split. As of October 2026, Lindy rates 4.9 on G2 from about 170 reviews, where people like how fast it gets going, and 1.7 on Trustpilot from 40, where most complaints are about credits running out sooner than expected and billing.
Sources: Lindy pricing, Lindy pricing, Lindy on G2, Lindy on Trustpilot
What does Lindy do well?
Lindy is strongest at personal communication work for each teammate, such as inbox triage, scheduling, meeting notes, and follow-ups, alongside a shared teammate in Slack channels.
When someone mentions Lindy in a Slack channel, the work is visible to the team; in a DM, it's personal. Lindy also works over email and iMessage, with a web app for management.
Its memory is a versioned file explorer: personal files stay private, team files are readable by everyone and edited by owners and admins, and built-in files are read-only. Team skills are shared and managed by admins, and Lindy picks the relevant skill on its own.
Routines start from a schedule, an email, a Slack message, a calendar event, or a finished meeting, and a dry run reads real data without sending anything. You choose which actions in shared Slack threads need approval.
A team whose day is meetings and email gets a lot from that package.
Sources: Lindy introduction, Lindy memory, Lindy skills, Lindy routines, Lindy guardrails
How do the Lindy alternatives compare at a glance?
Maito is the Lindy alternative with no per-person price, the AI provider you choose, and the whole bug-to-fix job in the same thread as the follow-up email.
| Maito | Viktor | Claude Tag | Tasklet | Adapt | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charged per person | MaitoNo, $149 per workspace | ViktorNo, workspace credits | Claude TagClaude seats plus usage | TaskletNo, per organization | Adapt$8 per user |
| Who can ask | MaitoAnyone in an invited channel | ViktorNo seats needed | Claude TagConfigurable for all members | TaskletMembers it's shared with | AdaptEach user on a seat |
| Email and calendar | MaitoThrough each person's connections | ViktorFollow-ups and CRM updates | Claude TagThrough connected tools | TaskletEmail triggers and actions | AdaptThrough connected tools |
| Private memory | MaitoPersonal memory, private DMs | ViktorPersonal profile | Claude TagSeparate DM memory | TaskletFollows agent sharing | AdaptScoped by identity |
| Code changes | MaitoSandbox, checks, QA, pull request | ViktorBranches and pull requests | Claude TagCommits and pull requests | TaskletGitHub tools and instant apps | AdaptIssues to tested pull requests |
| Recurring work | MaitoLoops on a schedule or webhook | ViktorScript and agent jobs | Claude TagRoutines in channels | TaskletSchedules, webhooks, email | AdaptScheduled jobs and events |
| Security | MaitoEncrypted Vault, audit log | ViktorSOC 2 Type 1 | Claude TagSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 | TaskletSOC 2 | AdaptSOC 2 Type II, VPC option |
| Price for ten people | Maito$149 plus provider usage | ViktorFrom $50 plus top-ups | Claude TagClaude plan plus usage | TaskletFrom $25 | Adapt$80 plus usage |
Sources: Maito: workflow, access, and context, pricing. Viktor: workflow, access, context, pricing. Claude Tag: workflow, access, context, pricing. Tasklet: workflow, access, context, pricing. Adapt: workflow, access, context, pricing.
Is Maito a good Lindy alternative?
Yes. Maito is a good Lindy alternative for teams that want one AI teammate for the whole company, including the people who ask once a month, at $149 per workspace with unlimited people, plus your AI provider's usage.
Anyone in a channel where Maito is invited can mention it and reply in its threads, without a Maito account, account linking, or a seat. People who want private DMs link their own account from Slack's Home tab in one step, and no admin has to approve them.
Maito covers the same communication work through each person's connections: a personal Gmail or calendar connection stays visible only to its owner, and shared work uses connections the team chose to share. It remembers each person's role and preferences privately and learns company facts from shared threads.
Where it goes further is the product itself. When a customer call turns up a bug, the same thread can go from the call notes to a reproduced bug, a video, a fix with tests, QA, a pull request, and the follow-up email.
Illustrative conversation, not a recorded product test.
@Maito notes from today's call with Halden are attached. Draft the follow-up, and look at the invoice PDF bug they showed me.
Follow-up is drafted in your Gmail with the three action items from the call. The bug is real: invoice PDFs cut off line items after page one when a customer has more than 25 seats. Video of it attached. PR #377 fixes the page break and adds a test with 60 line items. QA passed on the preview.
I'm on billing, first time in this thread. Can the fix ship before their renewal on the 28th?
Yes, it's ready for review now. I'll add the release date to Marta's follow-up once it merges.
Sources: Maito FAQ
How does Maito handle what Lindy handles in DMs?
Maito keeps DMs private to the person who sent them, keeps personal connections personal, and never teaches the company from a private conversation unless asked.
Each DM conversation belongs to one Maito member. A connection marked Only me works in that person's unshared chats, and no one else's agent can use it. When someone wants a fact from a private chat to become company knowledge, they ask Maito to share it; the conversation itself stays private.
Lindy's meeting recording is the clearest thing Maito doesn't package the same way. Maito works with the notes, transcripts, and recordings your meeting tool already produces, through your connections.
Best for: teams where many people ask now and then, and customer calls turn into product fixes. Falls short of Lindy: no built-in meeting recorder, no SOC 2 report, and no free plan.
Sources: Maito FAQ
Is Viktor a good Lindy alternative?
Viktor is a good Lindy alternative for teams that want no seat fee and heavier work, such as dashboards, internal apps, and code, from Slack or Microsoft Teams.
Viktor charges the whole workspace from $50 a month for 20,000 shared credits, or $100 for 40,000, with top-ups and spending caps. It does reports, campaigns, CRM updates, and code fixes with pull requests, and remembers personal, team, and workflow knowledge.
Unused credits roll over one billing period, then expire, and work pauses at zero.
Best for: companies on Microsoft Teams that want model costs inside one bill. Falls short of Lindy: no personal inbox and calendar assistant for each person, and SOC 2 Type 1 instead of Type II.
Sources: Viktor pricing, Viktor skills and memory, Viktor billing guide
Is Claude Tag a good Lindy alternative?
Claude Tag is a good Lindy alternative for companies already on Claude Team or Enterprise that want a shared Claude in Slack channels with careful memory scopes.
Each channel keeps its own notes, public channels add to a workspace memory, and DMs stay separate. Routines post updates, watch channels, and check monitoring. It commits and opens pull requests as the Claude GitHub App.
Channel work is billed by usage to the organization, and member access can include everyone in the Slack workspace.
Best for: Slack teams that have chosen Claude and have an Owner ready to set it up. Falls short of Lindy: Slack only, no email or iMessage, and it needs a Claude Team or Enterprise plan first.
Sources: Claude Tag memory, Claude Tag agent identity, What is Claude Tag
Is Tasklet a good Lindy alternative?
Tasklet is a good Lindy alternative for a team that wants unlimited members and a set of business agents it builds and shares, such as an onboarding agent or a reporting agent.
Agents start private and can be shared with organization members, with "can use" and "can manage" roles. They run on schedules, webhooks, and incoming email, and use a browser on paid plans.
Pricing is per organization: $25 a month for 10,000 credits, $100 for 40,000, with no charge per member.
Best for: operations teams that want a few agents running fixed processes. Falls short of Lindy: you manage agents in Tasklet's own app rather than talking to one teammate in Slack threads.
Sources: Tasklet teams FAQ, Tasklet changelog, Tasklet pricing
Is Adapt a good Lindy alternative?
Adapt is a good Lindy alternative for a technical team that wants a configurable company agent and a lower per-user price, with usage billed separately.
Adapt connects to CRM, finance, warehouse, support, HR, and developer tools, keeps a company brain of knowledge, skills, and memory, and governs actions with scopes, approvals, budgets, and audit records.
Managed Adapt is $8 per user per month plus compute, storage, memory, and models; ten users start at $80 a month.
Best for: technical teams that want to own model routing, budgets, and deployment. Falls short of Lindy: more setup, and compute and models arrive as separate metered charges.
Sources: Adapt platform, Adapt Enterprise, Adapt pricing
What happens to the Lindy bill when the team grows?
As of October 2026, Lindy's bill rises by $49.99 for every new active user. Maito's subscription stays at $149 whether five people use it or fifty.
| 5 people | 10 people | 25 people | What else you pay | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindy | 5 people$249.95 | 10 people$499.90 | 25 people$1,249.75 | What else you payCredit top-ups at $10 per 1,000 |
| Maito | 5 people$149 | 10 people$149 | 25 people$149 | What else you payYour AI provider's usage |
| Viktor | 5 peopleFrom $50 | 10 peopleFrom $50 | 25 peopleFrom $50 | What else you payCredit top-ups |
| Adapt | 5 people$40 | 10 people$80 | 25 people$200 | What else you payCompute, storage, memory, and models |
The credits buy different things: Lindy's seats bring pooled model credits, Viktor's subscription includes them, and Maito's model usage goes to your own AI provider.
Sources: Viktor pricing, Adapt pricing
How can you test the Lindy alternatives on one job?
Give two products from the shortlist the same three follow-ups: Ada owes Lake a proposal and Field an invoice confirmation, Ben owes Hill a review booking. Good work is three unsent drafts with the right owner on each.
Have someone who isn't a daily user ask, because that's the person a per-seat price counts. Then add a twist from a real customer call, like a bug they mentioned, and see which one carries it from the follow-up to a fix.
So should you choose Maito or Lindy?
Choose Maito if you want everyone in the company to use one AI teammate without a seat each, with product and code work done in the same thread. Choose Lindy if a personal meeting and inbox assistant for every regular user is the main job.
Choose Maito if…
- Many people ask occasionally, and seats add up
- Customer conversations often turn into product fixes
- You want to choose the AI provider and see its bill
- Your team also works by email and in Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Codex, Grok, or Muse
Choose Lindy if…
- Every user wants a personal inbox and meeting assistant
- Meeting recording is a must-have
- Your team is small and uses it all day
Count how many people would ask an AI teammate for something at least once a month, not only the daily users. That number usually decides between a price per person and a price per workspace.
Lindy alternatives: frequently asked questions
What is the cheapest Lindy alternative?
Tasklet, at $25 a month for the whole organization with 10,000 credits, as of October 2026. Viktor starts at $50 per workspace, and Adapt costs $8 per user before metered usage.
Which Lindy alternatives don't charge per user?
Maito, Viktor, and Tasklet. Maito is $149 per workspace, Viktor bills workspace credits, and Tasklet bills the organization, all with unlimited people. Claude Tag needs Claude seats and Adapt charges $8 per user.
Can I try a Lindy alternative for free?
Viktor and Tasklet both start with free credits and no payment; Viktor's go up to $100. Maito and Claude Tag have no free plan, and managed Adapt has no free tier.
Which Lindy alternative can fix bugs in our product?
Maito, Viktor, Claude Tag, and Adapt all open pull requests in your existing repositories. Maito also reproduces the bug, records a video, and runs your checks and QA before the pull request.
Which Lindy alternatives have a SOC 2 report?
As of October 2026: Claude Tag through Anthropic's SOC 2 Type II, Adapt with SOC 2 Type II, Tasklet as SOC 2 compliant, and Viktor with Type 1. Maito doesn't have a SOC 2 report; it keeps credentials in an encrypted Vault and gives admins an exportable action log.
Sources: Tasklet pricing, Viktor pricing, Adapt pricing, Maito pricing, Viktor pricing, Tasklet pricing, Viktor pricing, Tasklet pricing, Maito pricing, Maito FAQ, Viktor, Adapt platform, Anthropic certifications, Adapt pricing, Tasklet trust and security, Viktor security